Massachusetts Anti-Casino Ballot Question Gets Nixed by State AG

Massachusetts Anti-Casino Ballot Question Gets Nixed by State AG

A citizens’ anti-gambling effort has been shot down by the State’s Attorney General

While the state of Massachusetts is gearing up for rapid expansion of gambling in the state, not everybody has been excited about the move. That’s why some anti-gambling activists there have created a petition in an effort to force a statewide vote on whether or not the casino jobs could be able to move ahead.

Those who are against the new casinos had been able to gather sufficient signatures to send the ballot question forward to the attorney general’s office. But unfortuitously for them, the continuing state solicitor but a stop to your move, saying that the ballot concern would not be legal underneath the state’s ballot effort process.

Constitutional Provisions Preclude Ballot Question

Under the ongoing state Constitution, the ballot initiative procedure is covered by Article 48. That article not just outlines the process for getting a relevant concern in the ballot, but also establishes exactly what can and cannot be included in such concerns. One of the rules for proposals claims that they cannot restrict an entity’s ‘right to get settlement for personal property appropriated to public use’.

According to state solicitor Peter Sacks, if the question were to be authorized by the public, thus closing the casino deals immediately, it might take the casino developers’ contract rights away without any settlement. It would a Lanjutkan membaca “Massachusetts Anti-Casino Ballot Question Gets Nixed by State AG”