Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley stands by her decision to reject a ballot proposal to repeal the state’s 2011 casino legislation. (Image: AP Photo/Elise Amendola)
Opponents of casino gambling in Massachusetts have been war that is waging the expansion on every battlefront possible. They’ve had wins and losings across the continuing state, but they’ve always made their case. Now, they’re hoping that the court that is highest in Massachusetts can give them one final possiblity to put the matter before voters.
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court heard arguments last week over the question of whether a measure to repeal the 2011 casino law can show up royal vegas casino games on the statewide ballot in November. The move would really create a referendum on whether gambling enterprises could be built one which could disrupt the process also if it absolutely was to ultimately fail.
State Believes Implied Contracts Could Be Violated By Repeal
That disruption ended up being one of the main arguments made by attorneys for their state, including Attorney General Martha Coakley, whom rejected the petition because she felt it was unconstitutional. According to Coakley, such a repeal would affect the ‘implied agreements’ between casino license applicants and the state gambling payment. She argued that those contract rights would be illegally removed without any payment for the casino organizations.
Coakley made remarks at a break fast Lanjutkan membaca “Massachusetts High Court Hears Case for Casino Repeal Vote”